Today was quite a big day for Tanner - he cut his first tooth and he got his first haircut, and he's probably sick too! Here's a we-just-discovered-his-first-tooth-before-his-haircut picture. I'll have to publish an after haircut picture once I remember to take them. (Thanks Mom for your help! I'm sure I couldn't have done it on my own!) And, as soon as we can get a picture of the tooth (right now he's too busy rubbing his tongue on it to let us even see it!) we'll post that too!
23 March 2009
A Big Day for Tanner
Today was quite a big day for Tanner - he cut his first tooth and he got his first haircut, and he's probably sick too! Here's a we-just-discovered-his-first-tooth-before-his-haircut picture. I'll have to publish an after haircut picture once I remember to take them. (Thanks Mom for your help! I'm sure I couldn't have done it on my own!) And, as soon as we can get a picture of the tooth (right now he's too busy rubbing his tongue on it to let us even see it!) we'll post that too!
Labels:
Tanner
Classic Kiersten
We have loved having Grandpa and Grandma Berrett out to visit this past weekend! They took Kiersten and Tanner to the park Saturday morning. After they had played on the swings (a favorite for both Kiersten and Tanner), played with Kiersten's new game (Sticky Ball, I think it's called) and had a snack Kiersten asked Grandpa if he wanted to play football. When he said he would like to, she answered, "Ok, let me put on my makeup first." She then sat down, and pulled out her "make-up" (some new lip gloss and chapstick from Grandma and some of Mom's empty eye shadow containers) and put it on, while holding the football in her lap so that no one could get to it until she was ready. Yep, that's my girl!
Labels:
Kiersten
Play Date at the Zoo
Last week our ward playgroup had a play date at the zoo. It was a little (ok, VERY) crazy and crowded (apparently Wednesdays, the day we went, are field trip day at the zoo, and several schools were out for Spring Break), but we managed to have fun anyway. I don't have that much to tell about the trip - just some cute pictures of the kids to share.


In case you're wondering, Kiersten dressed herself that day and even though the high was close to 90 insisted on wearing her long sleeve shirt. When I tried to warn her that she'd be too hot she said, "That's ok, I can just take my jacket." Sometimes she gets a little confused!
We ended the trip with a short train ride around the lake in the park next to the zoo. I had to keep a tight hold on Tanner because he kept trying to climb out the window to play at the park!
Labels:
family outings
09 March 2009
Botanical Gardens
I'd talked about going to the Botanical Gardens with Kiersten several days before, and then not too long after that, she asked me if she could take her doll to Kindergarten with her. I was a little confused because I wasn't sure where Kindergarten came from, but explained to her that when she goes to Kindergarten she'll need to leave all of her dolls at home so that she will be able to listen to her teacher without getting distracted. Not too long after that she made some other reference to going to Kindergarten soon and I reminded her she still had over a year to go before she got to go to Kindergarten. She got really upset and yelled at me that I'd told her we could go to Kindergarten on Saturday (she's a child who doesn't do well with plan changes!). All of a sudden I realized that she was confusing "Botanical Garden" with "Kindergarten!" Once we got that little misunderstanding straightened out, we were able to make plans for going to the Botanical Gardens!
This was the first time we'd been to the Botanical Gardens, and I was really impressed. They had a butterfly exhibit with the most beautiful butterflies from Central and South America. We couldn't get Kiersten in to see the butterflies, though, because it was in a greenhouse, and the butterflies were flying around free and she didn't like the idea of them landing on her! So she settled for just looking through the window!
Kiersten said that her favorite part was a model train that was set up. I really liked the iris garden - unfortunately it wasn't in bloom! I'll bet it is gorgeous later this spring. I'm not sure what Nate enjoyed the most. And I think Tanner liked it all - riding in the backpack, feeling like he's king of the world!
Who'd have known that in February it would be 85 degrees, and I'd be worried about my children getting sunburned? That's winter in Tucson for you, I guess.
Labels:
family outings
07 March 2009
Speed Demon!
Tanner is getting to be quite the speed crawler. He seems to go the fastest whenever he sees something open that he's not supposed to be in, namely the fridge! Here's a sample of how fast he's getting. (Poor kid had no idea he was being set up!)
Earlier Today I looked up from doing the dishes and saw him walking and pushing a chair across the living room. It took a minute to register that it was the first time he'd actually taken steps like that by himself.
Earlier Today I looked up from doing the dishes and saw him walking and pushing a chair across the living room. It took a minute to register that it was the first time he'd actually taken steps like that by himself.
Labels:
Tanner
19 February 2009
My Jury Duty Experience
So a couple of weeks ago, I reported to the Arizona Federal District Court for Jury Selection (apparently, I had not answered the questions on the questionairre in quite the right fashion to be disqualified from the case). This was my first Jury Duty stint, so I was curious how things worked. They started with about 60 of us, and I was on the first panel of 18 called up for questioning. I made a point of mentioning that I was an Engineer, thinking they would drop me for sure for that. Well, apparently that didn't work. I was chosen as one of the final 10 Jurors (which dropped to 8 by the end of the trial).
The case was a Civil Lawsuit (which you might have heard about in the news by now) in which illegal immigrants were suing a Douglass, AZ Rancher named Roger Barnett. The final claims by the plaintiffs dealt with violation of civil rights, false imprisonment, assault, battery, and infliction of emotional distress. It was rather interesting to me that the case was even in court, given the plaintiffs' legal status. However, the judge made clear from the beginning that we were not ruling on that. We were to focus souly on the "rules of law" that were to be given us at the end of the closing arguments. Here is a link to an article about the case: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/18/rancher-cleared-in-rights-case/
It has been interesting to me to read about what is in the news about the case and compare it with what was actually presented in court. It kind of makes me think twice about judging a court case based on a reporter's article. This case was difficult in that there were very few "hard facts." Everything was based on testimony, which was always conflicting, right down to the location of the incident. Most articles I've read just assume the incident occured on the Rancher's land. There was no conclusive evidence even of that (though there were questions we the Jury were just itching to ask certain witnesses that would have shed more light on the subject).
Here are a few of my "lessons learned:"
- The 6th floor of the Evo A de Concini Courthouse has free wireless internet, but the Jury Deliberation room on the 5th floor does NOT.
- How good your lawyer is makes a big difference
- Lawyers do have a pretty tough job sometimes (but the jokes about them are still all true)
- The current method of border control is completely inadequate (all of the illegal aliens testified that they basically had no fear of getting caught by Border Patrol - just inconvenient that they would have to try again. It almost made it sound like a game)
- It alerted me of new terminology to use in arguments: "Objection, foundation", "Objection, assumes facts not in evidence", "Objection, argumentative", and "Objection, asked and answered."
- Court recorders are amazing. I don't know how they keep up.
- Now I know where to go for topographical maps - across the street from the courthouse.
- Downtown Tucson traffic is a pain at 5 p.m. I'm glad I don't have to deal with it.
The case was a Civil Lawsuit (which you might have heard about in the news by now) in which illegal immigrants were suing a Douglass, AZ Rancher named Roger Barnett. The final claims by the plaintiffs dealt with violation of civil rights, false imprisonment, assault, battery, and infliction of emotional distress. It was rather interesting to me that the case was even in court, given the plaintiffs' legal status. However, the judge made clear from the beginning that we were not ruling on that. We were to focus souly on the "rules of law" that were to be given us at the end of the closing arguments. Here is a link to an article about the case: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/18/rancher-cleared-in-rights-case/
It has been interesting to me to read about what is in the news about the case and compare it with what was actually presented in court. It kind of makes me think twice about judging a court case based on a reporter's article. This case was difficult in that there were very few "hard facts." Everything was based on testimony, which was always conflicting, right down to the location of the incident. Most articles I've read just assume the incident occured on the Rancher's land. There was no conclusive evidence even of that (though there were questions we the Jury were just itching to ask certain witnesses that would have shed more light on the subject).
Here are a few of my "lessons learned:"
- The 6th floor of the Evo A de Concini Courthouse has free wireless internet, but the Jury Deliberation room on the 5th floor does NOT.
- How good your lawyer is makes a big difference
- Lawyers do have a pretty tough job sometimes (but the jokes about them are still all true)
- The current method of border control is completely inadequate (all of the illegal aliens testified that they basically had no fear of getting caught by Border Patrol - just inconvenient that they would have to try again. It almost made it sound like a game)
- It alerted me of new terminology to use in arguments: "Objection, foundation", "Objection, assumes facts not in evidence", "Objection, argumentative", and "Objection, asked and answered."
- Court recorders are amazing. I don't know how they keep up.
- Now I know where to go for topographical maps - across the street from the courthouse.
- Downtown Tucson traffic is a pain at 5 p.m. I'm glad I don't have to deal with it.
11 February 2009
Cinder-Kiersten
So many of you may know that Kiersten has been having a problem with picking up her toys - she doesn't want to! Rig
ht before Christmas we tried "toy time-out," where everything we had to pick up went into the garage for a week. As soon as she realized that her toys weren't going in the trash, and that we were going to pick them up she didn't care how long they stayed in the garage. In fact, some things have been in the garage for the last 3 months and she doesn't care. So last week I tried another version of "toy time-out" - she now has to do a job for each thing she wants to get out of toy time out. So far the only things she's been motivated to get out are birthday presents for her friends, the morning of the party! The first morning I had her washing some of Tanner's toys in t
he sink and all of sudden she says to me, "Mom, look! I'm like Cinderella. I have to do lots of jobs like she does!" Two days later when she was ready for the other birthday present I had her dust the baseboards in the hallway. She refused to take off her Cinderella dress while she worked. I guess because she has to do jobs like Cinderella, she needs to dress like Cinderella! Unfortunately I haven't been able to get her to jobs to get things like her shoes out of time out - she always chooses to wear different shoes rather than do an extra job!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)